![]() |
BRIDG Main | About | Research Reports | Business Indicators | FAQ | Contact |
| BRIDG: Business Research and Information Development Group |
Friday, December 05, 2008
2:09:10 AM CST
|
||
| Field
Faculty Findings Report Innovation, Learning Organizations and Industrial Relations by Peter Nielsen & Bengt-Åke Lundvall |
|
| Presented by Wendy Harrington
B&I Specialist, Monroe County |
December 2003
|
|
What is a learning organization and why is it important? A learning organization can be seen when horizontal interaction and communication within the firm promotes knowledge creation. In today's environment, knowledge becomes obsolete so quickly that business must work continually to attain new competencies. Nielsen and Lundvall state that "a learning economy is thus one in which the ability to attain new competencies is crucial to the economic success of individuals and to the performance of firms, regions and countries." What do companies gain from "learning"? A rapidly changing environment is not conducive to the once traditional hierarchical organization. Functional flexibility is key in today's businesses. Businesses are changing from a linear form of innovation to a more interactive form of innovation. Strict borders between functions (customers, employees, competition) make a firm inefficient. This puts a growing emphasis on building relationships with suppliers, customers and competition in becoming a double loop learning system. What is this study based on? Over 2000 Danish firms were surveyed in 1996 and then again in 2001 to establish changes in their business and what traits worked in a positive or negative correlation with those changes. Frequency of product innovation was the dependent variable. What were some of the key findings?
Why did the businesses want to change?
What factors increase a firms "learning" ability?
14 different dimensions were studies and broken down into four
factors:
What factors are most significant? Each has a significant factor in innovation, but the first, "Integrative organization" shows the largest. This factor alone doubles the changes for product innovation. The other factors do show a moderate increase in innovation. In addition, the bundling of these factors showed that when firms grow in size, the share of use of these characteristics as well as innovation and development increases as well. One out of five small firms have developed a learning organization where one of every two large firms have. Interestingly, this study, done on Danish businesses, shows a high share of "developed" and "learning, innovative firms" to be foreign companies. What affect does employee participation have on organizational
change?
Results overwhelming support higher innovation and organizational change in firms using direct contact such as meetings and ad hoc-project groups. Project groups with joined participation of management and employee representatives have the strongest effect on organizational change. What does this mean to businesses? Businesses in manufacturing and services who are constantly working to be innovative and efficient sometimes become trapped in a fast pace world and forget that learning must become and inherent trait of the whole organization. Failing to include employees and other functions in the organizational decision making process will result in a lack of innovativeness and knowledge. Businesses should be encouraged to support those traits associated with an "integrated organization", such as employee participation, cross training, quality circles and integration. Larger firms are statically more apt to master some qualities associated with a learning organization, and therefore are more innovative and efficient. |
|
|
|